← Back to Stranger Things
Stranger Things Season 3
Season Analysis

Stranger Things

Season 3 Analysis

Season Woke Score
6.8
out of 10

Season Overview

Budding romance. A brand-new mall. And rabid rats running toward danger. It's the summer of 1985 in Hawkins ... and one summer can change everything.

Season Review

The third season of "Stranger Things" shifts its focus to themes of growing up, changing relationships, and the changing landscape of 1980s America, personified by the introduction of the Starcourt Mall. The central narrative revolves around a budding romance and an underlying Soviet conspiracy operating beneath the town's shiny new commercial center. The season actively elevates its female characters to central roles as problem-solvers while frequently portraying the main male characters as either overbearing, bumbling, or emotionally stunted. This dynamic places significant ideological weight on gender roles and modern socio-economic critique. The plot explicitly links the primary evil to a corporate front, framing a critique of American consumerism and local corruption. The new characters and subplots introduce explicit themes of female independence and LGBTQ+ identity, marking a clear departure from the traditional archetypes of the 1980s setting. The overall tone balances the nostalgic horror-adventure with noticeable contemporary social commentary that frames masculinity, capitalism, and traditional institutions as flawed or secondary to the competence of marginalized groups.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics6/10

The narrative features a subplot where a female protagonist faces blatant 'old-fashioned' workplace sexism at the hands of established white male journalists, casting an institution of the era in a negative light. The young Black character, Erica, is elevated into a central, hyper-competent, and explicitly outspoken 'STEM nerd' role, even delivering dialogue that champions capitalism in a manner some critics found to be a shoehorned ideological speech, moving her beyond simple 'merit' and closer to a symbolic insertion.

Oikophobia7/10

The season’s central setting, the Starcourt Mall, and the corrupt Mayor are explicitly framed as the front for the sinister plot. The narrative ties the ultimate evil (the Mind Flayer's resurgence) to corrupt American capitalistic expansion and local political corruption, suggesting a foundational flaw in the 'home' culture. The Soviet villains are cartoonishly evil, but the threat is enabled by the homegrown, corporatist greed that destroys local main street businesses. This positions the unchecked American civilizational impulse (consumerism/capitalism) as the primary enabler of chaos.

Feminism9/10

Female characters consistently demonstrate superior competence, intelligence, and moral clarity compared to their male counterparts. Eleven and Max bond over a shared critique of 'stupid boys' and the restriction of patriarchal-style oversight (Hopper), encouraging El's independence from her male-centered relationships. The new character, Robin, is a brilliant code-breaker, contrasting sharply with Steve, who is reduced to a bumbling comic sidekick. Hopper is intentionally written to be overly aggressive and controlling, forcing a clear conflict where toxic masculinity is an obstacle to be overcome.

LGBTQ+6/10

A new main cast member, Robin, is introduced and revealed to be a lesbian in a poignant moment that is immediately accepted without prejudice by her male friend and would-be love interest, Steve. This is presented as an affirmation of her identity in a show set in the 1985 era, which rewrites the typical social reality of the time. The implication of another core male character's queer identity is also strongly hinted at through a character's dialogue regarding a lack of interest in girls.

Anti-Theism1/10

Religious themes or institutions are virtually absent from the plot, which remains focused on a scientific/supernatural threat countered by human ingenuity and courage. The narrative does not contain any vilification of Christian characters or faith as a source of evil, nor does it explicitly engage with objective truth vs. moral relativism; the moral compass is firmly rooted in the defense of friendship and innocent life.