← Back to Directory
Spider-Man: Homecoming
Movie

Spider-Man: Homecoming

2017Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi

Woke Score
4
out of 10

Plot

A young Peter Parker/Spider-Man begins to navigate his newfound identity as the web-slinging super hero Spider-Man. Thrilled by his experience with the Avengers, Peter returns home, where he lives with his Aunt May, under the watchful eye of his new mentor Tony Stark. Peter tries to fall back into his normal daily routine - distracted by thoughts of proving himself to be more than just your friendly neighborhood Spider-Man - but when the Vulture emerges as a new villain, everything that Peter holds most important will be threatened.

Overall Series Review

The film recontextualizes the Spider-Man story within a heavily diverse New York high school environment, featuring numerous non-white actors in roles traditionally held by white characters, including Peter's love interest and best friend. This heavy reliance on race-swapping for diversity raises the score in Identity Politics. However, the core narrative is a classic superhero origin story, emphasizing Peter Parker's personal journey to embrace humility and responsibility, contrasting him with the villain's focus on self-interest and class-based resentment. The female characters are underdeveloped and primarily exist to support the male protagonist’s arc, surprisingly resulting in a low Feminism score because the film avoids 'Girl Boss' tropes. Explicit themes of civilizational self-hatred, gender ideology, or anti-theism are not central to the plot.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics7/10

Multiple key supporting roles like Liz Allan (love interest), Michelle Jones-Watson ('MJ'), and Flash Thompson are explicitly race-swapped from their original comic book depictions in a clear effort to increase on-screen diversity. The plot includes a minor character (Michelle) delivering a pointed line that critiques the Washington Monument as being built by slaves, creating a moment that shifts the focus to systemic oppression. Despite the main hero and villain remaining white, the extensive and intentional 'forced insertion of diversity' in the supporting cast raises the score considerably.

Oikophobia3/10

The narrative's primary conflict is not hostile to Western civilization but rather critiques the wealthy elite and crony capitalism within it, as the villain is a working-class man who was wronged by Tony Stark's government-backed cleanup company. However, one character openly dismisses the 'white, waspy Happy Days/American Graffiti milieu of 1960s Spidey' as something gone and deserving of being gone. Another character's line explicitly reframes the Washington Monument as a monument to slavery, directly criticizing a national symbol of the home culture. This demonstrates a mild degree of civilizational critique without becoming the central plot.

Feminism2/10

Female characters are largely reactive and secondary to Peter’s story, which results in a low score, as they do not exhibit the 'Mary Sue' or 'Girl Boss' tropes. The critique is often that the female roles are 'woefully written women' who are objectified (Aunt May is the subject of 'hot' jokes) or serve only as an object of Peter's desire (Liz). The core relationship dynamic is the male hero protecting his love interest, and Aunt May's primary role is an obstacle Peter must hide his identity from. Men are not universally depicted as incompetent; the protagonist and his mentor (Tony Stark) are central to the action, demonstrating male protective competence and mentorship.

LGBTQ+2/10

Alternative sexualities are a non-factor in the main storyline. A minor classmate character, Seymour, is implicitly depicted as gender-nonconforming or gay, appearing briefly in a discussion and later at the dance in a suit. This inclusion is subtle, non-central, and presented without any explicit political lecturing on gender or sexual theory. The main focus remains on Peter's heterosexual teenage crush and his nuclear-adjacent family structure (Aunt and Nephew).

Anti-Theism2/10

The movie is entirely secular, and religion is absent from the conflict or character motivation. Morality is instead framed in the classic secular humanist hero's code of 'responsibility' inherited from a previous cinematic iteration of the character. There is no hostility toward religion or specific vilification of Christian characters. Peter's struggle is a purely personal, ethical one, adhering to an objective moral law (selflessness for the greater good) rather than subjective 'power dynamics'.