← Back to Raw
Raw Season 1
Season Analysis

Raw

Season 1 Analysis

Season Woke Score
1.4
out of 10

Season Overview

This is the year that started a sports-entertainment phenomenon. Don't miss Monday Night Raw's inaugural season, featuring classic rivalries like Razor Ramon vs. 1-2-3 Kid, Bret Hart vs. Jerry Lawler, and more.

Season Review

Season 1 of this 1993 sports-entertainment program is a product of the WWF's 'New Generation Era' and does not engage with the themes of modern cultural criticism. The show is built on a clear, binary structure of good versus evil (babyface vs. heel), relying on hyperbolic, cartoonish gimmicks rather than complex social commentary. The central drama revolves around physical competition and simple personal rivalries, such as the major upset victory of the underdog 1-2-3 Kid over the established star Razor Ramon, which is a narrative firmly rooted in the concept of meritocracy and seizing opportunity. The content is overtly masculine, traditional in its morality, and completely devoid of any focus on identity politics, gender theory, or civilizational critique. The structure is one of pure conflict and simple morality, placing it entirely outside the frame of the 'woke mind virus' analysis.

Categorical Breakdown

Identity Politics1/10

Characters are defined by occupational or nationalistic caricatures and bombastic gimmicks, not by intersectional characteristics or systemic oppression. Conflict is explicitly framed as hero vs. villain based on action and personality. The show celebrates the underdog's merit and perseverance, as demonstrated by the 1-2-3 Kid's upset victory over Razor Ramon, which launched his career. There is no vilification of 'whiteness' or forced diversity lecture.

Oikophobia2/10

The narrative frequently features expressions of American patriotism, particularly in the presentation of heroic characters like Lex Luger. The show’s themes often position American or Western concepts of honor and heroism against foreign antagonists, such as Yokozuna, framing institutions like the nation as a clear positive force. The underlying message is one of national pride against foreign or anti-social threats, not civilizational self-hatred.

Feminism1/10

The show is dominated by male characters whose masculinity is protective, competitive, or villainous, but never framed as inherently toxic. Female characters are extremely rare and function primarily as managers or valets; they are not positioned as 'Girl Boss' leads, nor are males emasculated to elevate them. Motherhood and career dynamics are completely absent from the narrative focus.

LGBTQ+1/10

The core structure is normative, focused entirely on the traditional male-female pairing as the unstated standard for society, though sexuality is largely private and not a factor in the plot. Alternative sexualities or gender ideology are entirely absent from the presentation, as is any deconstruction of the nuclear family.

Anti-Theism2/10

Religious themes are minimal, usually confined to specific character gimmicks like The Undertaker's supernatural lore or the brief appearance of a silly character like Friar Ferguson. The morality of the show is clearly objective, separating characters into 'good' (faces) and 'evil' (heels), and there is no messaging that frames traditional religion as the root of evil.